Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

 

Common Problems:

 RFC Connections remain in SM04

Outbound Scheduler (SMQS) remains in status WAITING

Inbound Scheduler (SMQR) is in status WAIT

Deleting unwanted entries from RFC tables (ARFCSSTATE, ARFCSDATA etc.)

Many background ARFCXXXX jobs visible in SM37

CPIC Return Code 679 - Transaction Program not Registered

QRFCTRACE table contains an excessive amount of entries

RFC Trace files Increasing in Size

Remote Logon button in SM59 does not work

Test connection in SM59 fails with the error Invalid Length. Check Parameters

Entries with error message “Error when opening an RFC connection” in transaction SM58

tRFC calls in SM58 fail with the error Logon failed



Other RFC issues:


Unicode option in SM59 cannot be changed

SAP-OSS RFC destination fails with Username or password is incorrect. Please re-enter

Reorganize option in transaction SMQ1 and SMQ2

RFC destination fails with error Incomplete Logon Data

RFC destination fails with error Failed to open sideinfo.dat

How to check if Oracle Statistics have been updated as per Note 1020260

Resources in Transaction SARFC Explained

Running RSTRFCEG or RSTRFCEH indicates No inconsistencies

Gateway connections remain open because of firewall

How to find the correct application component if Queues are in status SYSFAIL

Logon screen is shown in Sm59 when doing a Connection Test

Entries are in status "Transaction Executing" in Sm58

Example scenarios using “Max Runtime” and “Scheduler Monitoring” in SMQS

RFC passwords not available after system copy, client copy or migration

 










 

1 Comment

  1. Unknown User (xc1ou30)

    I have a senerio  where  2 RFC FMs

    first one updating  customer (ship to party)adress  (ADDR) through  xd02 BDC recording

    second one is using sales_order_create bapi to create sales order in SAP - but if the customer address is not present in SAP  then calling the first RFC to create the address  first and then creating the sales order.

    now the problem is  that it is observed by bussiness that -

    while these  2 FMs are used in tandem  the  existing customer master of the ship to is getting changed with the address passed in the sales_order creation  RFC.

    We tested the RFCs with different or same user name in all possible combination but could not replicate the senerio......So My QUESTION IS -

    IS  IT REALLY POSSIBLE THAT  ONE RFC's   LOCAL/GLOBAL VARIABLE VALUES GET PASSED TO THE NEXT CALL OF THE SAME RFC ?

    As we know each individual RFC call is maintained in different rfc session.